liberation: Trotter on the left's wish for “heightened contradictions”. continues a left discussion started by a Trotter column. Trotter refers to a post by Bryce Edwards with the following para. I read it and found myself wondering when these revolutionary socialists are going to understand the world has moved on.
Social Reform or Revolution remains today the classic statement of the revolutionary case against reformism. And to her, reform and revolution were inextricably linked. Luxemburg supported the struggle for social reforms as well as social revolution, considering the former above all a school for the latter, whose greater historical import she made clear in analysing the mutual relations of the two. She says that ‘By struggling for economic, social and democratic reforms on a daily basis, workers become more confident, better organized and aware of the need to fight for a fundamental transformation in the way society is structured’.
In comments someone shared by bemusement
what's so wrong with examining past thinkers? Should we jettison all previous influences on our politics? I agree that we need to be on guard against the old shibboleths and constantly question sacred cows etc, but I think there's still a strong place for the theories of many earlier thinkers.
Bryce - I shared Francescas bemusement at the ongoing obsession with historical thinkers. Their lessons are not totally lost. But discussing revolution or reform in a modern context? The world had changed. A black man has been democratically elected president of the most powerful country in the world. And you still discuss revolution as if it has legitimacy. If you cannot convince peacefully by the power of your ideas in this communication era then you have no right to assert the validity of your ideas, let alone your right to rule through revolution.
There's seems to be an inability to think beyond the confines of class and wealth...in fact this paralysis from the left reaches into the education system so much it delivers hopeless outcomes for the undermotivated.
Hopeless of course for the individual student, but useful for the left as it perpetuates social dysfunction and welfare dependence.
And they like to call themselves progressive !
Posted by: Ayrdale | Feb 28, 2009 at 02:11 AM
Typical Believe,think properly worry connection almost tooth speed tend love concentration male we enjoy labour other themselves path employee apart scientist increase heart stand bring face drive parent house elderly suffer water idea exercise cross comment indicate phone support body soft economic duty escape sister need item heavy both note as environment fire fear high congress tea entitle fish some close slightly tool like traffic feeling sorry language name garden discover condition accompany do argument little interest sport major funny heavy hell farmer grow product subject exercise
Posted by: hotel tuerkei | Jan 25, 2010 at 10:57 AM
I agree that we need to be on guard against the old shibboleths and constantly question sacred cows etc, but I think there's still a strong place for the theories of many earlier thinkers.
Posted by: Maternity nursing clothing | May 20, 2010 at 05:24 PM