When will helengrad sack the smarmy git My right has a disturbing revelation on the newspeak that has got to the heart of what helengrad is legislating and another devastating indictment of that prat Maharey.
"Now it would be easy to dismiss this as the work of a typical Government Department leather elbow cardigan clad plonker - but there is something a bit more disturbing than that. For a long time now the Government has been quizzed on what exactly is meant by "the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi" which has found it's way into all sorts of legislation and Government Department mandates. If this is an interpretation accepted by this Government - God help us."
Wanted to comment on this post and realised that Adolf thinks I have blog odour. But its My Right. We are both unloved. Just like maharey. (which is the only thing we have in common).
so My Right. a challenge to you. In fact two challenges. one to My right and the other to non nzp/dpf blogs in/on nz. Rise to the top of google with the googlewhack "Maharey" and "prat" . Most points at end of October wins. waddayareckon. ( a googlewhack is two unique words that get one hit on google) Quite an interesting pastime on a Saturday evening after a few wines. Try it out.
UPDATE:just checked google. david farrar is already top of Maharey prat. So we wont use that. I will try for a real googlewhack.
Maharey and dick gets 584 hits. try again.
maharey - brainless? no. too many
maharey - greaseball? no. too many
maharey - smarmy? no. too many
maharey - git? no. too many
Maharey - dickhead 3 hits cant use that.
Maharey - twat promising but 3 hits.
maharey - wanker? no. loads
maharey - scumbag. no. too many
maharey - prick? no.too many
maharey - vain? no. too many
maharey - wanker? no. too many
maharey - weasel? no. too many
maharey - liar? no. too many
maharey - incompetent? no. heaps of them
maharey - stupid? no. 660 of them
maharey - ignorant? no. too many
maharey - lizard? no. too many
maharey - corrupt? no. too many
maharey - arrogant? no. loads of them
maharey - loud-mouthed ? no. too many
maharey - dork? no. too many
maharey - idiot? no. too many
maharey - brainfart? no. too many
maharey - scum? no. too many
maharey - bum? no. too many
maharey - obsequious (to helen)? no. too many
maharey - sycophant (as above)? no. too many
maharey - turkey? no. too many
maharey - goose? no. too many
maharey - duck? no. too many
maharey - dumb? no. too many
maharey - spineless? no. I am winning that already
maharey - gutless? no. too many
maharey - socialist ? no. too many
maharey - communist? no. too many
maharey - fascist? no. too many
maharey - slimy? no. too many
maharey - loser? no. too many
maharey - crap? no. too many
maharey - shit ? no. too many
maharey - plonker? Success - only 1 hit when I checked. And it is all thanks to Just Left. With referencing like that I will have to start reading his site again
So there you have it. Increase the number of google hits and who leads wins. Lets all join in. With the honourable exceptions of dpf/nzp and original googlewhack source Just Left - I will offer a bottle of whiskey to the highest google hit for a New Zealand blog for the search results on Maharey and plonker one month from today. Say 15 November. And a side bet to My right that I will kick your arse cos Adolf thinks you have blog odour.
Googling "Maharey" and "plonker" doesn't necessarily mean they are in the same sentence. And there could be a "is not a" in between the two terms. relying on Google to build an argument is a tenuous business and I wouldn't rate efforts like that very highly.
Posted by: hans | Oct 19, 2004 at 09:42 PM
BTW "Hide" and "plonker" comes up with 721 google results.
Posted by: hans | Oct 19, 2004 at 09:45 PM
hans. understand what a googlewhack is before you wibble. if you can make "is not a" top i will give you the prize. personally I think "Maharey is a plonker" will win. care for a side bet?
Posted by: sagenz | Oct 20, 2004 at 09:03 AM